My typical mode of voting is not for someone I like, but really against people I despise.

@Johnny_of_the_swamp I still haven't nt reached that point in my voting evolution. I went from not voting at all to voting on those things which I can stomach, which is usually NO on ballot initiatives. It's hard being anarchist in a representationalist, pyramid scheme democracy.

@Premitive1 the system sucks but doing nothing is a tacit approval for the status quo.

@Johnny_of_the_swamp I'll never agree with that reasoning. I don't concord with social contract theory. Doing nothing is tacit, but not approval. I would even go the other way and argue that the number of people not voting is tacit disapproval of the system, the inability to see a preferential outcome in the options upon which we vote. I don't have to like the status quo, but I also don't want to consent to the outcomes I don't like if I do. Partisans show this contradiction regularly.

Follow

@Johnny_of_the_swamp that's to say, most people vote specifically and only because they want their side to win, and they don't simply accept the outcomes of democracy when it goes another way, despite that being the explicit nature of "supporting democracy". In our country, like any other so-called democracy, parties are more like gangs, than the front line of freedom and liberty.
Have democrats accepted the results of Bush VS Gore, yet?

@Premitive1 "Every vote needs to count. That's why we're going to recount votes only in the districts where I won" - I never forgot this

Sign in to participate in the conversation
No Agenda Social

Home to Producers and Fans of the
No Agenda Show Podcast If you have an issue please DM @[email protected]