lol. i have no idea who steve shives is. But today i heard this guy's name, as famous sjw who blocks people. I went, and lo n behold, i am blocked!

lol.

and, same thing happened with the feminist freq anita fuck. I discovered i was blocked about 3 months ago, even i never visited her twitter or blog.

so, i guess am somewhat famous.

am guessing, they have a network of ban list. sjw leftist tend to do that. On mastodon too.

it's truly puzzling what these severe sjw types is thinking.
Apparently, he's a youtuber.
Is it possible sometimes in the past i posted a comment to his youtube ? not likely, since i rarely do.

how is it possible he blocked me on twitter?? i don't think am a famous anti sjw guy neither.

@xahlee Blockbots with shared lists, users can submit names for blocking with little or no review. Guilt by association if you follow or interact with evil accounts. I seem to be blocked by him as well; have never heard of him before reading your comment here.

@mattskala i see. quite interesting. so on twitter there's account that actively post people who, say, follow certain people? and the reader can just block those?

do you have a example handy?
thanks.

@xahlee I don't think it's coordinated by means of special Twitter accounts (too easy for the C&C account to become a target) but see projects like github.com/freebsdgirl/ggautob (which is one strong reason for me not to support FreeBSD, since they tolerate the author of that)

@mattskala @xahlee I don’t see what’s wrong with that. I only block boring people who get reposted by those I follow, but if there were a 4chan or reddit campaign against me, …!

When I heard Trump was blocking his critics, I didn’t get why this offended them, either.

I don’t suppose there’s a right-wing version of this yet, but don’t be surprised if one arises — as a fork of the repo.

What am I missing?

@wrenpile @xahlee If I block you because I don't want to read your stuff, that's my business. But if I tell 10000 people "Don't read this guy because he's an evil harasser" (today it would be "Nazi" but these systems are a couple years old now), and people take my word for it without checking, is that harmless?

@mattskala @xahlee There’s harm, but it’s widely distributed: largely from the fools who’ve never been attacked but still use the blocking software.

That said, I don’t think I have the right to order people who *are* being attacked not to use the s/w.

If I believe in free thought, I can deplore people burrowing into intellectual holes, but I can’t in good conscience stop them.

@wrenpile @xahlee Not saying they shouldn't be allowed to do it. But they're shmucks.

@mattskala @xahlee So it’s your opinion that *nobody* has been helped by them?

∑ XahLee
Follow

@wrenpile @mattskala
my reply too long. So i created a image instead.

@xahlee @mattskala

1/ Re muting: when I said I block boring people who get reposted by people I follow, I meant I mute tem; sorry.

I too reject the idea that anyone should expect to avoid ever being offended, especially in places supposedly designed for the exchange of ideas, like social media and universities.

@mattskala @xahlee

2/2 But that doesn’t mean colleges/social media shouldn’t have rules for soeech. Threats of violence are out, right? And I bet you think people who shout down a right-wing speaker, making him inaudible, should be disciplined, right?

If you have those rules, you need a repirting mechanism, too, right.

If course, you also need a fair review process. I’m not saying Twitter or any specific college does that correctly.

@wrenpile @xahlee > And I bet you think people who shout down a right-wing speaker, making him inaudible, should be disciplined, right?

If they are *only* shouting I'm not inclined to worry about it. But the minute that edges into violence...

Sign in to participate in the conversation
No Agenda Social

Home to Producers and Fans of the
No Agenda Show Podcast If you have an issue please DM @adam@noagendasocial.com